TRUTHSEEKER IS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR

[Psycho]

TRUTHSEEKER IS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR

 

Truthseeker is a paid and pathological liar and his job is to accuse me of lying on anything I say but he never presents any evidence that anything I have said is false because I have not been untruthful.

 

Truthseeker says that I lied about where I work. Not so. Below is my busines card and anybody is welcome to verify.

 

 

 

Edited June 23, 2006 by Slick Willie

[factchecker2]

There's no business card here. Why am I not surprised: Jonathan Rees has been lying about where he works.

[Psycho]

Look again moron!

 

 

There's no business card here. Why am I not surprised: Jonathan Rees has been lying about where he works.

[bfrankdc]

This is pretty funny. There is no mention of the IDC Website, www.idcinc.com. His "boss" Dr. Michael Griffiths, has an IDC email address, mgriffiths@idcinc.com. Why does Rees have a PeoplePC email and not an IDC?

 

Why is DC grammatically correct, but NW isn't?

 

This is almost as funny as the PG Hosptial Administrator ID Card.

 

B. Frank

 

TRUTHSEEKER IS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR

 

Truthseeker is a paid and pathological liar and his job is to accuse me of lying on anything I say but he never presents any evidence that anything I have said is false because I have not been untruthful.

 

Truthseeker says that I lied about where I work. Not so. Below is my busines card and anybody is welcome to verify.

 

[Psycho]

You can write me Bfrank at jonathan@idcinc.com and I will reply.

 

 

This is pretty funny. There is no mention of the IDC Website, www.idcinc.com. His "boss" Dr. Michael Griffiths, has an IDC email address, mgriffiths@idcinc.com. Why does Rees have a PeoplePC email and not an IDC?

 

Why is DC grammatically correct, but NW isn't?

 

This is almost as funny as the PG Hosptial Administrator ID Card.

 

B. Frank

[factchecker2]

Look again moron!

Email sent to mgriffiths@idcinc.com bounces back: no known recipient. That email address is supposed to belong to Dr. Michael Griffiths, DDS, at IDC. In fact, email sent to mgriffiths@idcinc.com has been bouncing for months. This certainly casts a lot of doubt on Jonathan Rees' assertions about where he works.

 

But don't just believe me: Go to www.idcinc.com and click on "Contact Us" See what happens to the email you send.

 

As for a business card -- anyone can print one with Photoshop. Even Rees.

[bfrankdc]

For a business card, the branding is different than the corporate website, and there is no mention of the corporate website, and it doesn't have your now referenced corporate email address. It has grammatical inconsistencies.

 

Doesn't seem like it passes the giggle test.

 

B. Frank

[Psycho]

Dr. G is having a new website created and his email has in fact been bouncing back but mine has not. Try it.

 

He changed it to mcgriffiths@idcinc.com

 

Call my office tomorrow and ask for me and see what happens.

 

 

Email sent to mgriffiths@idcinc.com bounces back: no known recipient. That email address is supposed to belong to Dr. Michael Griffiths, DDS, at IDC. In fact, email sent to mgriffiths@idcinc.com has been bouncing for months. This certainly casts a lot of doubt on Jonathan Rees' assertions about where he works.

 

But don't just believe me: Go to www.idcinc.com and click on "Contact Us" See what happens to the email you send.

 

As for a business card -- anyone can print one with Photoshop. Even Rees.

Edited June 23, 2006 by Slick Willie

[factchecker2]

I makes zero sense that the email address of IDC's boss would be broken for many months.

 

The only conclusion is that Rees is lying.

 

Dr. G is having a new website created and his email has in fact been bouncing back but mine has not. Try it.

 

Call my office tomorrow and ask for me and see what happens.

[Psycho]

It is not broken nor is mine jonathan@idcinc.com address but you never tried it because you do not want to give away your identity.

 

 

I makes zero sense that the email address of IDC's boss would be broken for many months.

 

The only conclusion is that Rees is lying.

[aglue]

It is not broken nor is mine jonathan@idcinc.com address but you never tried it because you do not want to give away your identity.

 

 

wow that website SUCKS...as a business manager I would think getting your web-portal to look semi professional would be pretty high up on your priority list. Good lord dude... it's like "throw back" website days to like 1989...

[bfrankdc]

It is, however, better than the Rees for Council website. I know it's not saying much.

 

B. Frank

 

wow that website SUCKS...as a business manager I would think getting your web-portal to look semi professional would be pretty high up on your priority list. Good lord dude... it's like "throw back" website days to like 1989...

[Psycho]

Hey Bfrank,

 

I never promised you a Rose Garden.

 

 

It is, however, better than the Rees for Council website. I know it's not saying much.

 

B. Frank

[truthseeker]

It is, however, better than the Rees for Council website. I know it's not saying much.

 

B. Frank

 

 

I should also like to point out that I haven't been posting ANYTHING on this website

for quite some time.

 

I'm not encouraging this jackass any longer, nor am I contributing to any website that

encourages his behavior for its own financial gain.

 

As you were.

[Psycho]

Truthseeker,

 

Are you accusing Luke and his friends of being motivated by $$$$$$ above all else?

 

This just goes to show how out of touch with reality you are.

I should also like to point out that I haven't been posting ANYTHING on this website

for quite some time.

 

I'm not encouraging this jackass any longer, nor am I contributing to any website that

encourages his behavior for its own financial gain.

 

As you were.

[Guest jim]

wow that website SUCKS...as a business manager I would think getting your web-portal to look semi professional would be pretty high up on your priority list. Good lord dude... it's like "throw back" website days to like 1989...

 

Totally. Anyone with a lick of business sense would have hired professional help to redesign that site a long time ago. It's really terrible.

 

But rees's site, with its EASY TO READ fonts, is definitely worse.

[factchecker2]

Equally interesting is the fact that the source code behind Jonathan Rees' website revealed that the site's author was not the world renowned web designer, Margaret Clay, but was, in fact Jonathan Rees. I have reprinted the original source code, which was captured and saved, below. Once Rees found out about this big oops in October 2005, he changed the "authorship" to pretend that Margaret Clay designed his site.

 

 

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>

<o:DocumentProperties>

<o:Author>Jonathan R. Rees</o:Author>

<o:Template>Normal</o:Template>

<o:LastAuthor>Jonathan R. Rees</o:LastAuthor>

<o:Revision>2</o:Revision>

<o:TotalTime>15</o:TotalTime>

<o:Created>2005-09-15T03:56:00Z</o:Created>

<o:LastSaved>2005-09-15T03:56:00Z</o:LastSaved>

<o:Pages>1</o:Pages>

<o:Words>296</o:Words>

<o:Characters>1693</o:Characters>

<o:Company>Rees for DC City Council</o:Company>

<o:Lines>14</o:Lines>

<o:Paragraphs>3</o:Paragraphs>

<o:CharactersWithSpaces>1986</o:CharactersWithSpaces>

<o:Version>10.6735</o:Version>

</o:DocumentProperties>

</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>

<w:WordDocument>

<w:Zoom>75</w:Zoom>

<w:SpellingState>Clean</w:SpellingState>

<w:GrammarState>Clean</w:GrammarState>

<w:Compatibility>

<w:BreakWrappedTables/>

<w:SnapToGridInCell/>

<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>

<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>

</w:Compatibility>

<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>

</w:WordDocument>

</xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object

classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object>

<style>

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }

</style>

<![endif]-->

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totally. Anyone with a lick of business sense would have hired professional help to redesign that site a long time ago. It's really terrible.

 

But rees's site, with its EASY TO READ fonts, is definitely worse.

[Psycho]

I am not trying to win a beauty contest!

 

 

 

Equally interesting is the fact that the source code behind Jonathan Rees' website revealed that the site's author was not the world renowned web designer, Margaret Clay, but was, in fact Jonathan Rees. I have reprinted the original source code, which was captured and saved, below. Once Rees found out about this big oops in October 2005, he changed the "authorship" to pretend that Margaret Clay designed his site.

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>

<o:DocumentProperties>

<o:Author>Jonathan R. Rees</o:Author>

<o:Template>Normal</o:Template>

<o:LastAuthor>Jonathan R. Rees</o:LastAuthor>

<o:Revision>2</o:Revision>

<o:TotalTime>15</o:TotalTime>

<o:Created>2005-09-15T03:56:00Z</o:Created>

<o:LastSaved>2005-09-15T03:56:00Z</o:LastSaved>

<o:Pages>1</o:Pages>

<o:Words>296</o:Words>

<o:Characters>1693</o:Characters>

<o:Company>Rees for DC City Council</o:Company>

<o:Lines>14</o:Lines>

<o:Paragraphs>3</o:Paragraphs>

<o:CharactersWithSpaces>1986</o:CharactersWithSpaces>

<o:Version>10.6735</o:Version>

</o:DocumentProperties>

</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>

<w:WordDocument>

<w:Zoom>75</w:Zoom>

<w:SpellingState>Clean</w:SpellingState>

<w:GrammarState>Clean</w:GrammarState>

<w:Compatibility>

<w:BreakWrappedTables/>

<w:SnapToGridInCell/>

<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>

<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>

</w:Compatibility>

<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>

</w:WordDocument>

</xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object

classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object>

<style>

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }

</style>

<![endif]-->

[Psycho]

Bfrank and so on, you are quite petty but you have never been able to critisize my platform so you pick on matters people see as silly and it makes you look bad.

 

 

Equally interesting is the fact that the source code behind Jonathan Rees' website revealed that the site's author was not the world renowned web designer, Margaret Clay, but was, in fact Jonathan Rees. I have reprinted the original source code, which was captured and saved, below. Once Rees found out about this big oops in October 2005, he changed the "authorship" to pretend that Margaret Clay designed his site.

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>

<o:DocumentProperties>

<o:Author>Jonathan R. Rees</o:Author>

<o:Template>Normal</o:Template>

<o:LastAuthor>Jonathan R. Rees</o:LastAuthor>

<o:Revision>2</o:Revision>

<o:TotalTime>15</o:TotalTime>

<o:Created>2005-09-15T03:56:00Z</o:Created>

<o:LastSaved>2005-09-15T03:56:00Z</o:LastSaved>

<o:Pages>1</o:Pages>

<o:Words>296</o:Words>

<o:Characters>1693</o:Characters>

<o:Company>Rees for DC City Council</o:Company>

<o:Lines>14</o:Lines>

<o:Paragraphs>3</o:Paragraphs>

<o:CharactersWithSpaces>1986</o:CharactersWithSpaces>

<o:Version>10.6735</o:Version>

</o:DocumentProperties>

</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>

<w:WordDocument>

<w:Zoom>75</w:Zoom>

<w:SpellingState>Clean</w:SpellingState>

<w:GrammarState>Clean</w:GrammarState>

<w:Compatibility>

<w:BreakWrappedTables/>

<w:SnapToGridInCell/>

<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>

<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>

</w:Compatibility>

<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>

</w:WordDocument>

</xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object

classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object>

<style>

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }

</style>

<![endif]-->

[Guest Guest]

Truthseeker, how come you never attack Rees on the issue but just a bunch of petty non-sense?

 

 

Equally interesting is the fact that the source code behind Jonathan Rees' website revealed that the site's author was not the world renowned web designer, Margaret Clay, but was, in fact Jonathan Rees. I have reprinted the original source code, which was captured and saved, below. Once Rees found out about this big oops in October 2005, he changed the "authorship" to pretend that Margaret Clay designed his site.

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>

<o:DocumentProperties>

<o:Author>Jonathan R. Rees</o:Author>

<o:Template>Normal</o:Template>

<o:LastAuthor>Jonathan R. Rees</o:LastAuthor>

<o:Revision>2</o:Revision>

<o:TotalTime>15</o:TotalTime>

<o:Created>2005-09-15T03:56:00Z</o:Created>

<o:LastSaved>2005-09-15T03:56:00Z</o:LastSaved>

<o:Pages>1</o:Pages>

<o:Words>296</o:Words>

<o:Characters>1693</o:Characters>

<o:Company>Rees for DC City Council</o:Company>

<o:Lines>14</o:Lines>

<o:Paragraphs>3</o:Paragraphs>

<o:CharactersWithSpaces>1986</o:CharactersWithSpaces>

<o:Version>10.6735</o:Version>

</o:DocumentProperties>

</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>

<w:WordDocument>

<w:Zoom>75</w:Zoom>

<w:SpellingState>Clean</w:SpellingState>

<w:GrammarState>Clean</w:GrammarState>

<w:Compatibility>

<w:BreakWrappedTables/>

<w:SnapToGridInCell/>

<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>

<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>

</w:Compatibility>

<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>

</w:WordDocument>

</xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object

classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object>

<style>

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }

</style>

<![endif]-->

[factchecker2]

It's valuable to point out that Jonathan Rees has been consistently lying about his campaign, his background -- and everything else. Does it matter that Rees actually designed his website, but said that "Margaret Clay" designed it? Yes, it matters a lot: This is more proof of Rees' lies.

 

He lied about who created his website. Rees lied about where he went to school. And let's not forget perhaps the biggest lie of them all: The lawsuit, USA and Rees v Daro Reality, in which Rees claimed to have been part of an anti-discrimination lawsuit. USA and Rees v Daro Reality never happened.

 

Truthseeker, how come you never attack Rees on the issue but just a bunch of petty non-sense?

[Guest Guest]

I do not think it matters who created Rees' website.

 

Why jump on Rees over silly matters or is it you cannot attack him on the merits of the positions he takes on issue of real importance.

[Guest Guest]

I do not think it matters who created Rees' website.

 

Why jump on Rees over silly matters or is it you cannot attack him on the merits of the positions he takes on issue of real importance.

 

 

"matters" eh?

 

hee hee