scooper Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 FINALLY PROOF THAT WARD 3 CANDIDATE SAM BROOKS SOLD OUT THE GLBT PEOPLE. Sam Brooks a candidate for the ward 3 city council seat says he supports the GLBT people but that has proven to be a lie! Can anybody deny that Ward 3 city council candidate Sam Brooks did not take over $10 grand from well know homophobe Jack Quinn a retired US Congressman and his homophobic employees? The proof is contained within Sam Brooks own 01-31-06 campaign finance filing? Go to his rival Rees\' website and look at Brooks filing but specifically for all contributions from Jack Pak, Jack Quinn and all persons using the mailing address of Cassidy & Associates and their spouses using other addresses. Brooks is attacking his rivals like a pit-bull dog out of anger for being exposed as a liar and enemy of all Gay, Lesbian, Bi and Transgender people and this is making him go nuts that he cannot stop lying and attacking his rivals. He has attacked Jonathan Rees for a long time, he has attacked Professor Mary Cheh, he has attacked former DDOT candidate Bill Rice and only God knows whom else he has attacked. Ask Sam Brooks rivals if they have been attacked and by whom…..!!!!!!! See the proof >>>>>> http://rees-for-citycouncil.com/homophobe.pdf SAM BROOKS NUMBER ONE SUPPORT MARTIN AUSTERMUHLE UPON SEEING THE PROOF BROOKS SOLD OUT THE GLBT PEOPLE ABANDON HIM AND WILL NOT LONGER SUPPORT HIM OR SPEAK ILL OF HIS RIVALS. BROOKS IS A THREAT TO ALL GAY, LESBIAN, BI AND TRANSGENDERED PEOPLE AND IT NOW HAS FINALLY BEEN PROVEN HE LIED TO THE GLAA, STEIN DEMOCRATS, ETC! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfrankdc Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 FINALLY PROOF THAT WARD 3 CANDIDATE SAM BROOKS SOLD OUT THE GLBT PEOPLE. Sam Brooks a candidate for the ward 3 city council seat says he supports the GLBT people but that has proven to be a lie! Can anybody deny that Ward 3 city council candidate Sam Brooks did not take over $10 grand from well know homophobe Jack Quinn a retired US Congressman and his homophobic employees? The proof is contained within Sam Brooks own 01-31-06 campaign finance filing? Go to his rival Rees\' website and look at Brooks filing but specifically for all contributions from Jack Pak, Jack Quinn and all persons using the mailing address of Cassidy & Associates and their spouses using other addresses. Brooks is attacking his rivals like a pit-bull dog out of anger for being exposed as a liar and enemy of all Gay, Lesbian, Bi and Transgender people and this is making him go nuts that he cannot stop lying and attacking his rivals. He has attacked Jonathan Rees for a long time, he has attacked Professor Mary Cheh, he has attacked former DDOT candidate Bill Rice and only God knows whom else he has attacked. Ask Sam Brooks rivals if they have been attacked and by whom…..!!!!!!! See the proof >>>>>> http://rees-for-citycouncil.com/homophobe.pdf SAM BROOKS NUMBER ONE SUPPORT MARTIN AUSTERMUHLE UPON SEEING THE PROOF BROOKS SOLD OUT THE GLBT PEOPLE ABANDON HIM AND WILL NOT LONGER SUPPORT HIM OR SPEAK ILL OF HIS RIVALS. BROOKS IS A THREAT TO ALL GAY, LESBIAN, BI AND TRANSGENDERED PEOPLE AND IT NOW HAS FINALLY BEEN PROVEN HE LIED TO THE GLAA, STEIN DEMOCRATS, ETC! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Rees Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 It is true Bfrank but the public record does affirm that Sam Brooks is a paid homophobe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
factchecker2 Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 This was posted last night on the Washington Post's blog. It's worth repeating here, because it put everything Jonathan Rees has written into context: "Rees has injected something into the ward three race that I've long felt was needed: frighteningly unhinged sociopathy." http://dceiver.blogspot.com/2005/11/ward-3...d-jonathan.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Rees Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Jason Linkins A/k/a as Dceiever is nobody worth quoting. He has no education or experience in judging another persons state of sanity and Truthseeker you are a stupid as they get to try and fool people into believing that Jason Linkins does as he is a well known drug addict, foul mouth individual and nobody with a brain in their head is going to accept him as being somebody who has the credentials to judge another persons mental state. This was posted last night on the Washington Post\'s blog. It\'s worth repeating here, because it put everything Jonathan Rees has written into context: \"Rees has injected something into the ward three race that I\'ve long felt was needed: frighteningly unhinged sociopathy.\" http://dceiver.blogspot.com/2005/11/ward-3...d-jonathan.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
factchecker2 Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Frist, I'm not Truthseeker. Second, the blog by DCeiver at http://dceiver.blogspot.com/2005/11/ward-3...d-jonathan.html is brilliant. You, Rees, may not like it, but it rings true. Third, the DCeiver blog is only one of many. Here is one more for anyone who stumbles across this thread via Google: http://squidpants.blogspot.com/2006/02/so-...-antics-of.html Jason Linkins A/k/a as Dceiever is nobody worth quoting. He has no education or experience in judging another persons state of sanity and Truthseeker you are a stupid as they get to try and fool people into believing that Jason Linkins does as he is a well known drug addict, foul mouth individual and nobody with a brain in their head is going to accept him as being somebody who has the credentials to judge another persons mental state. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Rees Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 (edited) You are missing the point, I just love irritating you worthless bums who have nothing positive to offer so in my free time, I come over to get a few laughs and poke fun at a bunch of losers. It is all done in fun but you losers take things too seriously. The good thing is, 97% of the voters never read these blogs/message boards let alone heard of them so keep on pissing in the wind fairies! Frist, I'm not Truthseeker. Second, the blog by DCeiver at http://dceiver.blogspot.com/2005/11/ward-3...d-jonathan.html is brilliant. You, Rees, may not like it, but it rings true. Third, the DCeiver blog is only one of many. Here is one more for anyone who stumbles across this thread via Google: http://squidpants.blogspot.com/2006/02/so-...-antics-of.html Edited May 22, 2006 by Mr Rees Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
factchecker2 Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 This is the point: http://dceiver.blogspot.com/2005/11/ward-3...d-jonathan.html What DCeiver has to say about Jonathan Rees is on target: "Rees has injected something into the ward three race that I've long felt was needed: frighteningly unhinged sociopathy." Everyone should read that blog. And when they're done with it, they should read: http://www.dcist.com/archives/2006/02/13/professionalism.php That about covers everything. You are missing the point, I just love irritating you worthless bums who have nothing positive to offer so in my free time, I come over to get a few laughs and poke fun at a bunch of losers. It is all done in fun but you losers take things too seriously. The good thing is, 97% of the voters never read these blogs/message boards let alone heard of them so keep on pissing in the wind fairies! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfrankdc Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 That's down from the 99% you have posted elsewhere. On what do you base your statistics? B. Frank The good thing is, 97% of the voters never read these blogs/message boards let alone heard of them so keep on pissing in the wind fairies! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Human Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 hummm? Ya know I might be able to write a good book on this; titled "how democrat treat their own". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Rees Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 (edited) I have this very big email list and I sent out a few months ago a request for people to check off which BLOG/MESSAGE BOARD they read and none wrote back saying they read DCist, DC Message Board or five others I listed. That says a lot but then again, most voters in ward 3 are over 45 and if they have a computer, it is strictly for email, shopping online or word processing and not to cruise the blogs, etc. That is why I say sissies like Bfrank, Truthseeker and Factchecker2 are pissing in the wind with all they say here just as I am. I am her just to harass those jackasses and nothing more because I like poking fun at fools. hummm? Ya know I might be able to write a good book on this; titled \\\"how democrat treat their own\\\". Edited May 23, 2006 by Mr Rees Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
factchecker2 Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 I have this very big email list and I sent out a few months ago a request for people to check off which BLOG/MESSAGE BOARD they read and none wrote back saying they read DCist, DC Message Board or five others I listed. That says a lot but then again, most voters in ward 3 are over 45 and if they have a computer, it is strictly for email, shopping online or word processing and not to cruise the blogs, etc. That is why I say sissies like Bfrank, Truthseeker and Factchecker2 are pissing in the wind with all they say here just as I am. I am her just to harass those jackasses and nothing more because I like poking fun at fools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Human Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Rees, hey! I actually like you. Anyone who gets into politics deserves respect. As a republican myself I didn't like Clinton's policies, But I SURE RESPECT him. Got to meet him also (my brother in-law is a hardcore democrat, I made his year when I took him to meet the Clintons.) What people do not understand about politicians, and there staff is that those people in politics really do this to help their respective communities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
factchecker2 Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Saying that Rees is in politics is like saying that a spammer is a businessman. Sure, a spammer is in business, but his business is scamming and deceiving people. Here is the kind of "politician" Rees is: http://squidpants.blogspot.com/2006/02/so-...-antics-of.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0800989_pf.html http://dceiver.blogspot.com/2005/11/ward-3...d-jonathan.html http://dcdl.org/2006/02/06/false-balance-ward-3 http://www.dcist.com/archives/2006/02/13/professionalism.php Rees, hey! I actually like you. Anyone who gets into politics deserves respect. As a republican myself I didn't like Clinton's policies, But I SURE RESPECT him. Got to meet him also (my brother in-law is a hardcore democrat, I made his year when I took him to meet the Clintons.) What people do not understand about politicians, and there staff is that those people in politics really do this to help their respective communities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Human Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Maybe, Just Maybe everyone should concentrate on the issues of the District of Columbia, and stop these personal attacks. It really would help alot. Typing about 1 person and concentrating about 1 person does not bring into light The problems that D.C. faces. Luke is correct in concentrating on the issues, and not on the personalities. Oh!!!! and how are the roads in ward 3??? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Saying that Rees is in politics is like saying that a spammer is a businessman. Sure, a spammer is in business, but his business is scamming and deceiving people. Here is the kind of "politician" Rees is: http://squidpants.blogspot.com/2006/02/so-...-antics-of.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0800989_pf.html http://dceiver.blogspot.com/2005/11/ward-3...d-jonathan.html http://dcdl.org/2006/02/06/false-balance-ward-3 http://www.dcist.com/archives/2006/02/13/professionalism.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Rees Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 Human, Bfrankdc, Truthseeker and Factchecker is part of the problem that DC faces. I mean, idiots who give DC a bad name. These three are radical gays and not part of the mainstream of the gay community and that is why people like Willie Wilson or Bishop Owens and others have come out of the woodwork. Without these three flamers, everything here on DC Pages would be cool. Of course, one of these three sissie is actually Martin Austermuhle of the blog known as DCist who probably needs a good kick in the teeth to set his sissie azz straight but I am sure one day someone else he pisses off will have that pleasure. It is hard to keep a civil tounge in one s mouth with these morons around. Maybe, Just Maybe everyone should concentrate on the issues of the District of Columbia, and stop these personal attacks. It really would help alot. Typing about 1 person and concentrating about 1 person does not bring into light The problems that D.C. faces. Luke is correct in concentrating on the issues, and not on the personalities. Oh!!!! and how are the roads in ward 3??? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
factchecker2 Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 Human, Bfrankdc, Truthseeker and Factchecker is part of the problem that DC faces. I mean, idiots who give DC a bad name. These three are radical gays and not part of the mainstream of the gay community and that is why people like Willie Wilson or Bishop Owens and others have come out of the woodwork. Without these three flamers, everything here on DC Pages would be cool. Of course, one of these three sissie is actually Martin Austermuhle of the blog known as DCist who probably needs a good kick in the teeth to set his sissie azz straight but I am sure one day someone else he pisses off will have that pleasure. It is hard to keep a civil tounge in one s mouth with these morons around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Rees Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 factchecker2 < soon to change screen name to Fagchecker2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfrankdc Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 factchecker2 < soon to change screen name to Fagchecker2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Human Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 Rees, when I saw the post on multiple alias disorder, I just chuckled. What is it? on aol a person can have at least 5 screen names? I understand very well the games being played. I figure that the ones doing this are just kids. At least I'm hoping that they are just kids. Blogs are just online diaries so the blogs that I've seen posted don't mean a thing. I've been online a very long time. I have seen just about every side of the human animal that there is to see, and some of it aint pretty either. What people at times fail to understand is that there is a difference between politics, and out right personal attacks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfrankdc Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 Human, Please demonstrate any posts I have made that you would regard as a "personal attack". I can demonstrate at least 50 posts that Mr. Rees and his various aliases have made that can be considered personal attacks (either in the form of lies, impersonations, or plain ludeness). B. Frank What people at times fail to understand is that there is a difference between politics, and out right personal attacks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Rees Posted May 26, 2006 Report Share Posted May 26, 2006 I have no aliases just a lot of friends who hate queers like BFrank. Human, Please demonstrate any posts I have made that you would regard as a "personal attack". I can demonstrate at least 50 posts that Mr. Rees and his various aliases have made that can be considered personal attacks (either in the form of lies, impersonations, or plain ludeness). B. Frank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
factchecker2 Posted May 26, 2006 Report Share Posted May 26, 2006 An observation: Jonathan Rees condems his critics for wasting their time by posting here, saying that almost nobody reads this forum. But then why does Jonathan Rees bother to post on DC Pages? I suspect that it is because he has been banned from just about everywhere else. I have no aliases just a lot of friends who hate queers like BFrank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Human Posted May 26, 2006 Report Share Posted May 26, 2006 Just for the record, I don't hate gay people in any way shape or form. This is part is for the ones who tried to get my i.p. address; I don't appreciate this type of behavior, again in any way shape or form. To me it's hacking, and I don't like hackers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I have no aliases just a lot of friends who hate queers like BFrank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Human Posted May 26, 2006 Report Share Posted May 26, 2006 By the way Rees, thank you for trying to come to my defense. I've been in a few cyber cat fights myself, and the conclusion that I came to “it really is a waste of time". MAJOR WASTE OF TIME. That's it, I'm done, lets get back to politics. Lets concentrate on the real issues like how to support our president "remember people, I am republican after all". Or for you all "How to make Washington D.C. a better place to live". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts