Sam Brooks Watch Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 Voters do not care where a candidate went to school. Voters do not care how many times a candidate was married or divorced. Voters do not care about how many children a candidate has. Voters do not care where a candidate works. THIS IS WHY WHAT ALL OF YOU TO DATE HAVE DONE AS NOT PHASED ANYONE.....!!!!! Voters do care if a candidate while in business failed time after time like George W. Bush has as that will show all that the candidates way of doing things has failed time after time and if (s)he brings those ideas to the council it might result in failure and cost you $$$$$ and heartache. Voters do care if a candidate opposes certain things that the majority wants. Voters do care if a candidate has a history of believing in or doing things contrary to the majority. Voters do care...................... So when you attack the private lives of candidates, you anger more voters than you might think with that stuff. Where you win the day is where you can establish for voters that the candidate at issue has taken stances on issues that are defective, out of touch with the main stream or would be upsetting to the majority. We will do a blog on Rees and Gaull because we see Brooks, Gaull and Rees as being possible movers and shakers in the future of DC politics but the other three are so bland that they do not interest us. Learn from the pros and how successful critics defeat candidates and none of you to date are doing it right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthseeker Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 Voters care if people lie. Voters do not care where a candidate went to school. Voters do not care how many times a candidate was married or divorced. Voters do not care about how many children a candidate has. Voters do not care where a candidate works. THIS IS WHY WHAT ALL OF YOU TO DATE HAVE DONE AS NOT PHASED ANYONE.....!!!!! Voters do care if a candidate while in business failed time after time like George W. Bush has as that will show all that the candidates way of doing things has failed time after time and if (s)he brings those ideas to the council it might result in failure and cost you $$$$$ and heartache. Voters do care if a candidate opposes certain things that the majority wants. Voters do care if a candidate has a history of believing in or doing things contrary to the majority. Voters do care...................... So when you attack the private lives of candidates, you anger more voters than you might think with that stuff. Where you win the day is where you can establish for voters that the candidate at issue has taken stances on issues that are defective, out of touch with the main stream or would be upsetting to the majority. We will do a blog on Rees and Gaull because we see Brooks, Gaull and Rees as being possible movers and shakers in the future of DC politics but the other three are so bland that they do not interest us. Learn from the pros and how successful critics defeat candidates and none of you to date are doing it right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfrankdc Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 Voters care if a candidate is out of touch with reality. B. Frank (By the way, since when is a politican supposed to bend to the will of the majority? If that were the case, SE Washington would look the same in 5 years that it does today. Last I heard, there will be a new baseball stadium on South Capitol Street) Voters do not care where a candidate went to school. Voters do not care how many times a candidate was married or divorced. Voters do not care about how many children a candidate has. Voters do not care where a candidate works. THIS IS WHY WHAT ALL OF YOU TO DATE HAVE DONE AS NOT PHASED ANYONE.....!!!!! Voters do care if a candidate while in business failed time after time like George W. Bush has as that will show all that the candidates way of doing things has failed time after time and if (s)he brings those ideas to the council it might result in failure and cost you $$$$$ and heartache. Voters do care if a candidate opposes certain things that the majority wants. Voters do care if a candidate has a history of believing in or doing things contrary to the majority. Voters do care...................... So when you attack the private lives of candidates, you anger more voters than you might think with that stuff. Where you win the day is where you can establish for voters that the candidate at issue has taken stances on issues that are defective, out of touch with the main stream or would be upsetting to the majority. We will do a blog on Rees and Gaull because we see Brooks, Gaull and Rees as being possible movers and shakers in the future of DC politics but the other three are so bland that they do not interest us. Learn from the pros and how successful critics defeat candidates and none of you to date are doing it right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Brooks Watch Posted April 1, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2006 All candidates lie or stretch the truth but and it was the baseball deal the will of the majority or just the political leadership? Voters care if a candidate is out of touch with reality. B. Frank (By the way, since when is a politican supposed to bend to the will of the majority? If that were the case, SE Washington would look the same in 5 years that it does today. Last I heard, there will be a new baseball stadium on South Capitol Street) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts