9/11 Truth Movement

[Guest Cliff]

Has anyone seen this?

 

A one hour analysis of 9/11 and how it is more likely than not that the United States government was actually behind the attacks.

 

Next to the work of Alex Jones, this is ranks up against the best of documentaries in the 9/11 Truth Movement

 

Written and Directed by Dylan Avery

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE

[Luke_Wilbur]

Jones believes several governments today are in collaboration to create a New World Order. The New World Order, according to Jones, is slowly taking away American liberties and plans to make the United States Constitution obsolete, helping the global elite further gain control. He is often characterized by his critics as a conspiracy theorist, though Jones and his supporters reject this label and refer to him as an independent investigative journalist.

 

I must say that his video is a hard pill to swallow.

[Guest jim]

I want to see a third party film of those missles. They might be digitally minipulated.

[Luke_Wilbur]

Cliff,

You may be interested in a release that was sent to me:

 

***************************************************

 

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it filed a lawsuit on February 22, 2006 against the Department of Defense to force the release of a video that allegedly shows United Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Judicial Watch seeks the information in part to help put to rest conspiracy theories that a government drone or missile hit the Pentagon rather than the hijacked United airplane.

 

Judicial Watch originally filed a Freedom of Information Act request on December 15, 2004, seeking all records pertaining to camera recordings from the Sheraton National Hotel, the Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, Pentagon security cameras and the Virginia Department of Transportation. The Department of Defense admitted in a January 26, 2005 letter that it possessed a videotape responsive to Judicial Watch’s request. However, the Pentagon advised that the video is exempt from release because it is, “part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias Moussaoui.”

 

Judicial Watch argues in its lawsuit that “there is no legal basis” for the DOD’s refusal to release the videotape. First, while the Freedom of Information Act does allow an exemption for ongoing law enforcement investigations, the Defense Department does not have law enforcement authority over Moussaoui. That belongs to the Department of Justice or the FBI. Second, the investigation of Moussaoui is complete. He pleaded guilty in April 2005 to conspiring with al-Qaida to fly planes into U.S. buildings. Jury selection in Moussaoui’s death penalty trial is nearly finished, and opening arguments are scheduled for March 6.

 

“There is no legal or rational basis for the Department of Defense to withhold this video,” said JW President Tom Fitton. “There may be nothing of importance on this tape, but our experience has been that whenever the government takes extraordinary measures to keep the lid on documents, it is worth investigating.”

[Guest Rep. Suzi Wizowaty]

Scholars and professionals with various kinds of expertise---including architects, engineers, firefighters, intelligence officers, lawyers, medical professionals, military officers, philosophers, religious leaders, physical scientists, and pilots---have spoken out about radical discrepancies between the official account of the 9/11 attacks and what they, as independent researchers, have learned.

 

They have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false and that, therefore, the official “investigations” have really been cover-up operations.

 

Thus far, however, there has been no response from political leaders in Washington or, for that matter, in other capitals around the world. Our organization, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, has been formed to help bring about such a response.

 

We believe that the truth about 9/11 needs to be exposed now---not in 50 years as a footnote in the history books---so the policies that have been based on the Bush-Cheney administration’s interpretation of the 9/11 attacks can be changed.

 

We are, therefore, calling for a new, independent investigation of 9/11 that takes account of evidence that has been documented by independent researchers but thus far ignored by governments and the mainstream media."

[Guest fireworks]

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/april2009/041409_government_agreed.htm

 

The senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission - John Farmer - says that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11, echoing the assertions of fellow 9/11 Commission members who concluded that the Pentagon were engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack.

 

Farmer served as Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (officially known as the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States), and is also a former New Jersey Attorney General.

 

Farmer's book about his experiences working for the Commission is entitled The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America's Defense on 9/11, and is set to be released in September.

 

The book unveils how "the public had been seriously misled about what occurred during the morning of the attacks," and Farmer himself states that "at some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened."

 

Only the very naive would dispute that an agreement not to tell the truth is an agreement to lie. Farmer's contention is that the government agreed to create a phony official version of events to cover-up the real story behind 9/11.

 

The publisher of the book, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, states that, "Farmer builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version not only is almost entirely untrue but serves to create a false impression of order and security."

[Guest Pedro]

Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies at the U.S. Army War College, on audio. The video details evidence on why it is 100% certain that Israel did 9/11 and the official story is a pack of lies.

To learn more about the conspiracy facts of 9/11, see:

http://www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm

http://www.takeourworldback.com/911realitydeniers.htm

The audio may be downloaded from:

http://www.archive.org/details/TheLibertyHour-WithDr.AlanSabrosky

An article by Dr. Sabrosky on 9/11 is available at:

http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2009/09/10/treason-betrayal-and-deceit-the-road-to-911-and-beyond/

His article of March 2010 entitled Zionism Unmasked: The Dark Face of Jewish Nationalism, discussed in the audio with Mark Glenn and Phil Tourney, is at:

http://gerontios48.wordpress.com/2010/03/09/zionism-unmasked-the-dark-face-of-jewish-nationalism/

[Guest HUMAN]

To pay for the stimulus, and health care; tax cuts go and tax hikes are already law.

 

The democrats are hoping you forget about this, and how they got those "Bills" passed, and just about everything else they did and are doing.

 

9/11 is as it happened, and maybe next time when the democrats want to drive the price of oil through the ceiling just to play political games with this nation’s security that they will think twice.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/april2009/041409_government_agreed.htm

 

The senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission - John Farmer - says that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11, echoing the assertions of fellow 9/11 Commission members who concluded that the Pentagon were engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack.

 

Farmer served as Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (officially known as the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States), and is also a former New Jersey Attorney General.

 

Farmer's book about his experiences working for the Commission is entitled The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America's Defense on 9/11, and is set to be released in September.

 

The book unveils how "the public had been seriously misled about what occurred during the morning of the attacks," and Farmer himself states that "at some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened."

 

Only the very naive would dispute that an agreement not to tell the truth is an agreement to lie. Farmer's contention is that the government agreed to create a phony official version of events to cover-up the real story behind 9/11.

 

The publisher of the book, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, states that, "Farmer builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version not only is almost entirely untrue but serves to create a false impression of order and security."

[Guest TruthSeeker]

Rupert Murdoch's Canadian Millennium Productions, Ltd. produced a X-Files television program, 'The Lone Gunmen', that was broadcast on March 4, 2001. The debut of the show in March 2001, began with Byers' father faking his death to uncover a conspiracy to hijack an airliner. The show predicted with uncanny accuracy the attacks of 9/11.

 

The Lone Gunmen authored a news publication called The Lone Gunman (once referred to as The Magic Bullet Newsletter; a pejorative reference to the single bullet theory and, like the group's name, a reference to the Kennedy assassination), of which Mulder was a loyal subscriber. None of them had day jobs; they relied on financial backers who believed in their cause, and what revenue the subscriptions to their paper generated. They shared a loft apartment (where they also worked) and used a 1970 Volkswagen Transporter to commute. All three characters died in the X-Files episode "Jump the Shark", which aired the year after The Lone Gunmen series was canceled.

 

 

Byers: “We know it’s a war game scenario – it has to do with airline counter-terrorism. But why was it important enough to kill for?”

Byers Snr: “Because it’s no longer a game.”

Byers: “If some terrorist group wants to act out this scenario, why target you for assassination?”

Byers Snr: “Depends on who your terrorists are.”

Byers: “…The men who conceived of it in the first place. You’re saying our government plans to commit a terrorist act against a domestic airliner?”

Byers Snr: “There you go, blaming the entire government as usual. It’s a faction, a small faction.”

Byers: “For what possible gain?”

Byers Snr: “The Cold War’s over, John. But with no clear enemy to stockpile against, the arms market’s flat. But bring down a fully loaded 727 into the middle of New York City, and you’ll find a dozen tin pot dictators all over the world just clamoring to take responsibility, and begging to be smart bombed.”

[Guest turn left]

This is better than the 'Wag the Dog' conspiracy

 

The only thing I believe was that Neo-conservatives used Liberalism as a guise to further their deeply held Realist goals in foreign countries.

[Guest Nestor]

Reasons why 911 was an inside job!!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpJdpoQJ1wA

[Guest human]

Okay!!! I have to ask; Are these folks on LSD?

[Luke_Wilbur]

This video humor video is not funny at all. Rather it shows disrespect for the greatest tragedy since Pearl Harbor.

 

[Guest RememberBuilding7.org]

RememberBuilding7 is a project of two groups, the New York City Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN) and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The goal of the campaign is to raise awareness of the free-fall collapse of Building 7; to inform the public that over 1,400 architects and engineers dispute the official 2008 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report attributing the collapse to fire, calling it “physically impossible”; and to bring the public to call upon the New York City Council to impanel a new investigation.

The new round of viral and TV exposure is designed to attract scrutiny by a new level of self-identified reasonable people to view the evidence for themselves.

The first campaign attracted the attention of Fox News Channel journalist Geraldo Rivera, who invited Bob McIlvaine and Tony Szamboti on his program, “Geraldo At Large,” in November. Rivera even showed video footage of himself in 2008 mocking demonstrators who were calling 9/11 “an inside job.” Back then, he told them, “Get a life,” but after seeing the ad last fall he said, “I am certainly much more open-minded about it than I was.”

Rivera then appeared as a guest on Judge Andrew Napolitano’s Fox Business Network program, “Freedom Watch,” to discuss his shift in perspective.

http://rememberbuilding7.org/destruction-of-evidence/

[Guest LAW]

Remarks by the President at "Pride of Midtown" Firehouse, Engine 54, Ladder 4, Battalion 9

New York, New York

 

11:29 A.M. EDT

 

THE PRESIDENT: Well, listen, the main reason I came here is because I heard the food is pretty good. (Laughter.)

 

But to the Commissioner, to Mayor Giuliani -- who obviously performed heroic acts almost 10 years ago -- but most of all, to all of you, I wanted to just come up here to thank you.

 

This is a symbolic site of the extraordinary sacrifice that was made on that terrible day almost 10 years ago. Obviously we can't bring back your friends that were lost, and I know that each and every one of you not only grieve for them, but have also over the last 10 years dealt with their family, their children, trying to give them comfort, trying to give them support.

 

What happened on Sunday, because of the courage of our military and the outstanding work of our intelligence, sent a message around the world, but also sent a message here back home that when we say we will never forget, we mean what we say; that our commitment to making sure that justice is done is something that transcended politics, transcended party; it didn’t matter which administration was in, it didn’t matter who was in charge, we were going to make sure that the perpetrators of that horrible act -- that they received justice.

So it’s some comfort, I hope, to all of you to know that when those guys took those extraordinary risks going into Pakistan, that they were doing it in part because of the sacrifices that were made in the States. They were doing it in the name of your brothers that were lost.

And finally, let me just say that, although 9/11 obviously was a high water mark of courage for the New York Fire Department and a symbol of the sacrifice, you guys are making sacrifices every single day. It doesn’t get as much notoriety, it doesn’t get as much attention, but every time you run into a burning building, every time that you are saving lives, you're making a difference. And that's part of what makes this city great and that's part of what makes this country great.

 

So I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart and on behalf of the American people for the sacrifices that you make every single day. And I just want to let you know that you're always going to have a President and an administration who’s got your back the way you’ve got the backs of the people of New York over these last many years.

 

So God bless you. God bless the United States of America.

 

And with that, I'm going to try some of that food. All right? Appreciate you. Thank you. (Applause.)

 

END

11:33 A.M. EDT

[Guest Secrecy Kills]

Former Top U.S. Officials Voice Suspicions Over CIA Withholding Critical Pre-9/11 Intelligence

 

In an audio documentary, Richard Clarke, a former top Bush counter-terrorism official, Bob Baer, a retired CIA officer, a Pulitzer-prize winning author, former FBI agents and 9/11 Commission Chairman Tom Kean voice their concerns over violations of protocol, outright deception and apparent malfeasance in the CIA’s handling of pre-9/11 intelligence.

 

Last week speaking to Dylan Ratigan on MSNBC, former Co-Chair of the Congressional 9/11 Joint Inquiry, Senator Bob Graham, called on authorities to re-open the investigation in the 9/11 attacks, referring to the CIA’s withholding of information about two future hijackers from the FBI.

 

The documentary Who is Rich Blee? features several interviews with direct witnesses to events beginning in early 2000, within the CIA’s Bin Laden Station, headed by its chief Richard Blee, tasked with tracking suspect Al-Qaeda operatives.

 

The release comes after the video in August of a controversial interview with Richard Clarke2 and follows a delay after the CIA made veiled threats of federal prosecution if the documentary revealed the names of two CIA analysts.

 

Beginning from a scant footnote in the 9/11 Commission Report (Endnote 44, Chapter 6) the program carefully builds a narrative how CIA intelligence about two future hijackers, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, including their presence in San Diego, was repeatedly withheld from the FBI and the White House.

 

These former officials, several of them for the first time, recount their experiences with the CIA and their suspicions surrounding violations of protocol and seemingly purposeful “bungling” of critical intelligence the CIA had in hand, that if shared, they believe would have likely prevented the 9/11 attacks.

 

Repeated and ongoing attempts by the CIA to obscure the facts around this case have raised concerns about possible criminal acts, and brought increased scrutiny on the CIA and a pattern of obstruction there in the 18 months leading up to 9/11.

 

“This was perhaps the closest U.S. intelligence got to foiling the 9/11 plot,” explains Producer Ray Nowosielski, “but instead of stopping the attack, the CIA stopped key intelligence about two high-value targets from getting to the right people, at least a half-dozen times. The podcast begins to examine the question, why?"

 

For further background information, visit SecrecyKills.com. The producers plan to release the second part of Who is Rich Blee? on October 11th.

 

[Guest TreadFree]

Posted this here. This is too important

 

A friend of mine gave me this new link about the happenings on 911. Check it out and please give me some feedback on what you think. Thanks...

 

http://youtu.be/bgwZ4waBcSE