WARD 3 CANDIDATE SAM BROOKS FINALLY ADMITS TO SMEAR CAMPAIGN

[Guest Sleazy Sam]

Ward 3 Candidate Sam Brooks Slings Mud At Rival Candidates

 

For a long time, Sam Brooks denied to the media he had any role in the mud slinging against any of his rivals but specifically against Candidate Jonathan Rees.

 

Rees is a decent man who did not deserve this hatefulness. See http://www.dc2006.net.

 

Brooks accused Rees of killing his first wife and so much more low handed stuff.

 

Finally Brooks admitted to the Washington Post that he had in fact engaged in mud slinging thus making all he said a lie to the people for so long.

 

IT IS TIME WE JUST SAY NO TO SAM BROOKS AND DEMAND THAT HE WITHDRAW FROM THE WARD 3 RACE.

 

Here is the proof where Brooks agrees to stop his pie throwing/mud slinging.

 

>>>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/dcwire/2006/02/calling_all_goodgovernment_typ_1.html

 

************************************************************

 

Somebody named John Capozzi spilled the beans when he openned his mouth in front of others up on Capitol Hill telling people that he, Sam Brooks, Tamela Gordon and a few others were the people bind the phony names badmouthing Candidate Rees on many message boards and on DC Pages, Luke Wilbur knows it and was allowing it.

 

Do not know who this Capozzi guy is but he shot off his mouth in front of too many people and what he said was passed on to the right people.

[truthseeker]

Ward 3 Candidate Sam Brooks Slings Mud At Rival Candidates

 

For a long time, Sam Brooks denied to the media he had any role in the mud slinging against any of his rivals but specifically against Candidate Jonathan Rees.

 

Rees is a decent man who did not deserve this hatefulness. See http://www.dc2006.net.

 

Brooks accused Rees of killing his first wife and so much more low handed stuff.

 

Finally Brooks admitted to the Washington Post that he had in fact engaged in mud slinging thus making all he said a lie to the people for so long.

 

IT IS TIME WE JUST SAY NO TO SAM BROOKS AND DEMAND THAT HE WITHDRAW FROM THE WARD 3 RACE.

 

Here is the proof where Brooks agrees to stop his pie throwing/mud slinging.

 

>>>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/dcwire/2006/02/calling_all_goodgovernment_typ_1.html

 

************************************************************

 

Somebody named John Capozzi spilled the beans when he openned his mouth in front of others up on Capitol Hill telling people that he, Sam Brooks, Tamela Gordon and a few others were the people bind the phony names badmouthing Candidate Rees on many message boards and on DC Pages, Luke Wilbur knows it and was allowing it.

 

Do not know who this Capozzi guy is but he shot off his mouth in front of too many people and what he said was passed on to the right people.

 

 

HA HA HAHAHAHA. The link you posted in no way demonstrates that Brooks "Admitted to the Washington Post" that he'd engaged in mudslinging. (That's you, remember? He's the guy who -hasn't- and has agreed to continue to behave in a professional manner. YOU'RE the guy who won't agree to even that.)

Anyone with a fifth grade reading comprehension level can see that...I'm surprised you provided that link, which is far more damaging to you, Mr. Alias. And go ahead, provide a link that shows he accused you of killing your wife. You can't, because that never happened. Though I'm sure you'll cook up some torturous and implausible backpedalling explanation.

 

Also: No one is buying your "I heard that" stories anymore. Especially since you've invoked the name of someone who questioned you on another board not long ago. And we've seen, too many times, how you like to lash back at people who use their given names to critique you. (Which is why so many people won't.) The story you've told about Mr. Capozzi never happened either.

 

Whatever dude. You were busted a long time ago (See "Multiple Alias Disorder" posts on this board.) No one believes anything you say anymore. You are not "a decent man."

[goldengirl]

Sorry Rees, just because YOU post something on a blog doesn't mean it's true.

 

In fact, you can't even seem to claim your own country of origin without contradicting it yourself. On mulitple dating sites (shady you're even posted on them since you 'claim' to be married) you 'claim' you're from Italy. On posts on the messageboards and other yahoo groups, you claim to be from Italy. But on DC Watch http://dcwatch.com/election2006/rees08.htm you claim to be from Puerto Rico...why all the contradiction? My guess is in an effort to hide your seriously scathed criminal history you changed your name when you claim to have moved to the states to avoid the sick, sick past you must have. But that is pure speculation.

 

And PLEASE for the 8 thousandth time, produce something to back of these claims of a smear campaign. You can't Rees and you know it. You are ALL lies. Like your marriage, your kids, your nasty internet sexual attempts (for the record):

Jonathan Rees' attempt to solicit sex take 1:

 

http://forums.washingtondc.craigslist.org/?ID=25967295

 

Jonathan Rees' attempt to solicit sex take 2:

 

Received: by 10.11.1.23 with SMTP id 23mr161921cwa; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:26:49 -0800 (PST)

Received: from 4.249.111.100 by f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com with HTTP;

Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:26:49 +0000 (UTC)

From: jrrees@peoplepc.com

 

To: "Discrete affairs in Washington DC area" <Discrete-affairs-in-Washington-DC-area@googlegroups.com>

Subject: ITALIAN MAN 40 ISO WM FOR KINKY SEX

Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:26:49 -0000

Message-ID: <1132975609.493196.246950@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

User-Agent: G2/0.2

X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; PeoplePal 3.0; InfoPath.1; PeoplePal 6.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)

 

MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

If you a kinky lady and would like to meet a hot Italian guy then let's

chat.

 

Everything about you is a lie and it would be in your best interest to at least get your story straight. And seriously what is this sick obsession with Brooks? In case you've failed to notice, you're making a complete ass out of yourself, and guess who knows it? Everyone but you apparently.

 

And on another note, sorry to hear about Collective Soul, I guess legal action from a band is all that scares you.

 

 

Ward 3 Candidate Sam Brooks Slings Mud At Rival Candidates

 

For a long time, Sam Brooks denied to the media he had any role in the mud slinging against any of his rivals but specifically against Candidate Jonathan Rees.

 

Rees is a decent man who did not deserve this hatefulness. See http://www.dc2006.net.

 

Brooks accused Rees of killing his first wife and so much more low handed stuff.

 

Finally Brooks admitted to the Washington Post that he had in fact engaged in mud slinging thus making all he said a lie to the people for so long.

 

IT IS TIME WE JUST SAY NO TO SAM BROOKS AND DEMAND THAT HE WITHDRAW FROM THE WARD 3 RACE.

 

Here is the proof where Brooks agrees to stop his pie throwing/mud slinging.

 

>>>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/dcwire/2006/02/calling_all_goodgovernment_typ_1.html

 

************************************************************

 

Somebody named John Capozzi spilled the beans when he openned his mouth in front of others up on Capitol Hill telling people that he, Sam Brooks, Tamela Gordon and a few others were the people bind the phony names badmouthing Candidate Rees on many message boards and on DC Pages, Luke Wilbur knows it and was allowing it.

 

Do not know who this Capozzi guy is but he shot off his mouth in front of too many people and what he said was passed on to the right people.

[Guest Sleazy Sam]

When Sam Brooks is quoted in that article that he will put down the PIES if they others do, then I think every intelligent person will interpret it as an admission that he was throwing the PIES/MUDSLINGING all along and maybe by a slip of the lip, he admitted to what so many believed.

 

I believe that Brooks started the mudslinging and Rees and his crew slammed him back.

 

You can put any twist on it you want but people are not stupid and will see what Brooks said as an admission that he in fact slung the mud all along and you are probably Capozzi, Brooks, Gordon or one of the others that Capozzi bragged about.

 

They are all guilty of the mudslinging so eat that you moron.

[goldengirl]

Calm down Rees, have another drink and slip back into your warped reality.

 

What's strange, there are no quotes around it, generally an indication that the writer has taken some creative liberties with the text. I'm surprised you haven't learned that seeing as how you're so well experienced in both the legal and dental office managing fields. I think I learned basic punctuation in 5th grade, but whatever.

 

Oh and stupid:

 

stu·pid Audio pronunciation of "stupid" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (stpd, sty-)

adj. stu·pid·er, stu·pid·est

 

1. Slow to learn or understand; obtuse.

2. Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.

3. Marked by a lack of intelligence or care; foolish or careless: a stupid mistake.

4. Dazed, stunned, or stupefied.

5. Pointless; worthless: a stupid job.

 

Strange, you seem to fit EVERY one of those definitions. Remarkable.

 

 

 

 

When Sam Brooks is quoted in that article that he will put down the PIES if they others do, then I think every intelligent person will interpret it as an admission that he was throwing the PIES/MUDSLINGING all along and maybe by a slip of the lip, he admitted to what so many believed.

 

I believe that Brooks started the mudslinging and Rees and his crew slammed him back.

 

You can put any twist on it you want but people are not stupid and will see what Brooks said as an admission that he in fact slung the mud all along and you are probably Capozzi, Brooks, Gordon or one of the others that Capozzi bragged about.

 

They are all guilty of the mudslinging so eat that you moron.

[truthseeker]

 

 

You can put any twist on it you want but people are not stupid and will see what Brooks said as an admission that he in fact slung the mud all along and you are probably Capozzi, Brooks, Gordon or one of the others that Capozzi bragged about.

 

They are all guilty of the mudslinging so eat that you moron.

 

Pretty language there. But anyway....

 

You've been caught, definitively, using aliases to post horrible things about Brooks (and others) repeatedly. (See "Multiple Alias Postings" IP address concordance, which no amount of spin can change.)

 

But you have yet to show a single post that accuses you of anything other than lying and slandering or being unstable. All anyone ever does is respond to your outrageous malice, illogic, deflection and distortion with fact, questions or criticism. And, sure, some snarky insults.

 

More importantly, you certainly haven't shown any link to Brooks or Bill Adler or Luke Wilbur or Martin Austermeuhle or Fred Vinson or John Capozzi or Nelson Jacobson or Melvin Blecher or any of the other people you've accused of orchestrating some mythical campaign against you. Hard to believe, but the folks who post responses to you here and on other boards are just trying to counter your own irresponsible and thoughtless posts with a measure of reality. Some of us, in other words, still believe in holding candidates to some basic ethical standard.

Edited February 20, 2006 by truthseeker

[Guest Sleazy Sam]

This is funny.

 

If Rees was actually posting then what you say might have some validity buy he is not.

 

You just cannot see your way Sam Brooks to accept the fact that there are a good number of people who do not like you, like the way you behaved in your last campain as we know it was you slinging mud at Kwame Brown and after a while Sam, you have made enough enemies and we want you to wake up because as long as you think it is this man Rees then you will always be off guard to who is really coming at you.

 

 

 

Pretty language there. But anyway....

 

You've been caught, definitively, using aliases to post horrible things about Brooks (and others) repeatedly. (See "Multiple Alias Postings" IP address concordance, which no amount of spin can change.)

 

But you have yet to show a single post that accuses you of anything other than lying and slandering or being unstable. All anyone ever does is respond to your outrageous malice, illogic, deflection and distortion with fact, questions or criticism. And, sure, some snarky insults.

 

More importantly, you certainly haven't shown any link to Brooks or Capozzi or Blecher or any of the 8 other people you've accused of orchestrating some mythical campaign against. Hard to believe, but the folks who post responses to you here are just trying to counter your own irresponsible and thoughtless posts with a measure of reality. Some of us, in other words, still believe in holding candidates to some basic ethical standard.

[goldengirl]

Wow. Pretty serious threats there. What are going after Sam with? Your ill-phrased internet attacks? Or are planning on stalking him? Rees, you reek of Single White Female. I still hold by my recommendation of counseling, maybe even rehab at this point. For goodness' sake, it's not even 5 o'clock and you're already full blown delirious.

 

This is funny.

 

If Rees was actually posting then what you say might have some validity buy he is not.

 

You just cannot see your way Sam Brooks to accept the fact that there are a good number of people who do not like you, like the way you behaved in your last campain as we know it was you slinging mud at Kwame Brown and after a while Sam, you have made enough enemies and we want you to wake up because as long as you think it is this man Rees then you will always be off guard to who is really coming at you.

Edited February 19, 2006 by golden girl

[bfrankdc]

Given that is is Rees and ONLY Rees who seems to have this past "history" in his brain, logic would dictate the facts:

 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ward3dc/message/233

 

B. Frank

 

This is funny.

 

If Rees was actually posting then what you say might have some validity buy he is not.

 

You just cannot see your way Sam Brooks to accept the fact that there are a good number of people who do not like you, like the way you behaved in your last campain as we know it was you slinging mud at Kwame Brown and after a while Sam, you have made enough enemies and we want you to wake up because as long as you think it is this man Rees then you will always be off guard to who is really coming at you.

Edited February 19, 2006 by bfrankdc

[truthseeker]

Given that is is Rees and ONLY Rees who seems to have this past "history" in his brain, logic would dictate the facts:

 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ward3dc/message/233

 

B. Frank

 

 

B:

 

For those of us who aren't members of that group, could you post the text?

 

Thanks.

 

TS

[bfrankdc]

This is but one of several examples of Mr. Rees referring to stuff that (I have no idea if they are true) may have happened in the past:

 

 

 

From: "Jonathan R. Rees" <jrrees@...>

Date: Sun Jan 15, 2006 1:57 pm

Subject: Re: THIS WAS EMAILED TO 6,000 VOTERS & PLACED ON BLOGS jrrees1955

 

Indeed, if Big Dan would take the time to do the researching of when

this online war began and talk to some of the former staffers for

Harold Brazil and Kwame Brown, then Big Dan and others will conclude

that Sam Brooks has always made smearing others a part of his

political campaigns and we cannot expect him to change even though

it has not benefitted him.

 

The public record speaks for itself but sadly people don't take the

time to see that many of the names here were there back in 2004 when

the attacks were against other rivals of Sam Brooks.

[truthseeker]

This is but one of several examples of Mr. Rees referring to stuff that (I have no idea if they are true) may have happened in the past:

From: "Jonathan R. Rees" <jrrees@...>

Date: Sun Jan 15, 2006 1:57 pm

Subject: Re: THIS WAS EMAILED TO 6,000 VOTERS & PLACED ON BLOGS jrrees1955

 

Indeed, if Big Dan would take the time to do the researching of when

this online war began and talk to some of the former staffers for

Harold Brazil and Kwame Brown, then Big Dan and others will conclude

that Sam Brooks has always made smearing others a part of his

political campaigns and we cannot expect him to change even though

it has not benefitted him.

 

The public record speaks for itself but sadly people don't take the

time to see that many of the names here were there back in 2004 when

the attacks were against other rivals of Sam Brooks.

 

 

Just as I expected. He can never provide screenshots or outside verification (aside from newly-minted aliases that pop up conveniently to say "I heard that, too!") His constant refrain of "everyone knows Brooks began this" rings completely hollow, and more so with each repetition.

 

And saying something is in "the public record" means nothing unless it's truly public. On the rare occasion when someone here has accused you of something specific, we've provided screenshots, IP addresses and links. Even when you've deleted a post, we've posted the screenshots. Interesting that you never do, or the links you provide once in a blue moon turn out to say something entirely different than what you've advertised.

Edited February 19, 2006 by truthseeker

[Guest Sleazy Sam]

Let me quote Sam Brooks per the Post article:

 

Sam says he will put down his lemon and vanilla pies if Rees and the others put down theirs.

 

 

HOW MUCH MORE OF AN ADMISSION TO MUDSLINGING BY BROOKS CAN YOU GET?

 

You people are so stupid that if GOD came along and badmouthed BROOKS you would probably accuse GOD of working for REES.

 

 

READ THIS AGAIN AND GET A LIF YOU MORONS

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/dcwire/2006...ment_typ_1.html