dattaswami Posted October 22, 2007 Report Share Posted October 22, 2007 Atheists criticize that Rama – took wine Rama and Krishna are not imaginary, - they are the absolute truth, This world is imaginary for God, - the stone bridge in the ocean Towards Lanka and the immersed – Dwaraka traced now in the sea Stand as historical proof for truth, - atheists are rigid stones, No use of preaching to them, - like blow of conch shell before deaf, Kauravas did not listen Krishna, - even several sages tried to change Duryodhana, Krishna showed – cosmic vision but every thing was waste. Atheists criticize that Rama – took wine according to Valmiki Ramayana, Non-vegetarian food and wine – are allowed for dynasty of Kshatriyas, Even God follows the tradition of – a community in which He is born, Following the tradition, - He mixes with the community and slowly Reforms the community, - it is like following the running bull initially, To stop it after some steps, initial mixing is essential for preaching. Same Rama was born as Buddha, - Buddha condemned that food and Preached non-violence of all – living beings opposing non-vegetarians. Datta was born in the caste of – Brahmins for whom wine is prohibited, Still Datta drinks to mislead - devotees from their firm faith on Him, Datta drinks to help undeserving, – because undeserving can’t be helped According to law of justice and – He forgets justice by drinking wine. But these undeserving fellows – criticize Him for drinking the wine! These atheists should not have – been born as human beings here, If Datta doesn’t drink wine, - these souls will be born as animals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts