DuPont in U.S., suspect of severe crime of contract fraud

[Guest Universal Agent: SXF]

(If you log on www.google.com, copy and paste the 8-Chinese character full name of Du Pont 美国杜邦化学公司or 6-Chinese character full name of Du Pont 杜邦化学公司, you could see more than 10 published English or/and Chinese open letters by me on more than 10 pages from the first one.)

 

Honorable ladies and gentlemen:

 

Mr. Huang strongly appeals to strictly sanction DuPont, the suspect of the severe crime of contract fraud, in accordance with the regulation of Article 224, Criminal Law of the Peoples Republic of China, please be generous to lend your precious support! DuPont Chemical Co. Ltd and Mr. Huang signed Biological Evaluation Agreement which was unilaterally established by DuPont without discussions in advance with Mr. Huang in 1995 (abbreviated for 1995 Agreement as below).

 

In 1995 Agreement, DuPont forwardly promised to pay for the patent fee and license fee to Mr. Huang after exclusively possessing his patented technology. After DuPont exclusively possessed Mr. Huangs effective and nontoxic agricultural pesticide patent technology according to 1995 Agreement, it has been refusing to pay for the patent fee and license fee to Mr. Huang without any warrant for 7 years or more. This is crime of contract fraud.

 

The gap between the price DuPont paid for the technology to Mr. Huang and those of similar Natural Pyrethrins-type technologies in world markets was extremely enormous (not considerably big or enormous, but extremely enormous); many especially severe situations accompanied: Holliday, President of DuPont, slandered China a raffish country and Mr. Huang a rascal for several times; DuPont signed a letter to threaten and intimidate Mr. Huang on June 2 2005; they also brought false charge against him before Chinese police in October 2005 but failed. Therefore, DuPont was a suspect of severe crime of contract fraud and must be sanctioned and punished in accordance with the Criminal Law!

 

To summarize, DuPont is far from a transnational hoodlum for debt repudiation, but a transnational suspect of crime of fraud. Debt repudiation means under the premises of acknowledging the creditors rights, the debtor postpones to repay the debt without warrant and specific repayment period. Under the circumstance without any warrant, DuPont has been refusing to pay for the patent fee and license fee to Mr. Huang for the past 7 years or more. Therefore, DuPont and its person in charge should be suspect of crime of contract fraud, but not debt repudiation, and should be strictly sanctioned in accordance with Article 224, Criminal Law of the Peoples Republic of China.

 

Since pirates were punished, DuPont should also be sanctioned according to the Criminal Law! Any independent and sovereign country will not allow any foreigner (natural person and legal representative) to be entitled to any illegal privilege in its own country, and China will certainly not be exempted.

 

 

Best regards!

 

Yours sincerely

 

Universal Agent: SXF

liuyanqing-2@sohu.com