Psycho Posted September 10, 2006 Report Share Posted September 10, 2006 Did you see that bogus Post poll giving Cheh 27% of the votes in the ward 3 race? That poll was taken on July 13-18, in the 20008 zip code area and only 200 people were questioned! Most of the 20008 zip is Mary Cheh's neighborhood. Political experts say that polls are subject to the buyers biases and voters should look at who is paying for those polls to see how inaccurate they are. All of the Post's preferred candidates got better poll results. Anyway, this poll was taken before all the Cheh controversies began. THE WASHINGTON POST WANTS TO PICK OUR LEADERS FOR US AND THAT IS WHY THEY THROW UP BOGUS POLL RESULTS THAT THEY TAINTED. THIS IS AN INSULT TO THE INTELLIGENCE OF VOTERS. LET THE VOTERS DECIDE AND NOT HAVE THE WASHINGTON POST MAKE US ACCEPT THEIR PREFERRED CANDIDATES. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcvoter99 Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Right. It was a poorly done poll. Cheh got 46% of the vote on election day. She was seriously slighted by that earlier poll. Unless Rees' smear campaign was seen for what it was and sharply increased support for her. The Post's endorsed candidates in D.C. all won. Did you see that bogus Post poll giving Cheh 27% of the votes in the ward 3 race? That poll was taken on July 13-18, in the 20008 zip code area and only 200 people were questioned! Most of the 20008 zip is Mary Cheh's neighborhood. Political experts say that polls are subject to the buyers biases and voters should look at who is paying for those polls to see how inaccurate they are. All of the Post's preferred candidates got better poll results. Anyway, this poll was taken before all the Cheh controversies began. THE WASHINGTON POST WANTS TO PICK OUR LEADERS FOR US AND THAT IS WHY THEY THROW UP BOGUS POLL RESULTS THAT THEY TAINTED. THIS IS AN INSULT TO THE INTELLIGENCE OF VOTERS. LET THE VOTERS DECIDE AND NOT HAVE THE WASHINGTON POST MAKE US ACCEPT THEIR PREFERRED CANDIDATES. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Posted September 16, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2006 This will be a first for the Washington Post as even KOJO said the Post had a horrible track record. Right. It was a poorly done poll. Cheh got 46% of the vote on election day. She was seriously slighted by that earlier poll. Unless Rees' smear campaign was seen for what it was and sharply increased support for her. The Post's endorsed candidates in D.C. all won. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts