factchecker2 Posted April 15, 2006 Report Share Posted April 15, 2006 For the record. Feel free to investigate these more. --------------- 1:90-cv-01360-SS REES v. DARO REALTY, INC. filed 06/11/90 closed 06/14/90 1:90-cv-02150-NHJ REES v. DARO REALTY, INC., et al filed 08/31/90 closed 01/24/91 1:91-cv-00334-NHJ REES v. DARO REALTY, INC., et al filed 02/14/91 closed 03/22/91 1:91-cv-01843-SS REES v. REYES filed 07/25/91 closed 08/06/91 1:91-cv-03287-HHG REES v. ARLINGTON CTY. JUVEN, et al filed 12/24/91 closed 03/04/92 1:94-cv-01364-RCL REES v. URBINA, et al filed 06/20/94 closed 07/27/94 1:96-cv-01238-GK PEARSON, et al v. KOLP, et al filed 06/04/96 closed 02/28/97 1:97-cv-02853-PLF REES v. KOLP filed 11/28/97 closed 01/30/98 1:88-cv-03515-RCL REES v. GRAHAM PHOTO SUPPLY filed 12/09/88 closed 02/28/89 1:89-cv-02095-GHR REES v. GRAY filed 07/26/89 closed 11/09/89 1:89-cv-02203-GHR REES v. CHON filed 08/03/89 closed 12/01/89 1:89-cv-03217-GHR REES v. FAMILY ACT. CENTER filed 11/30/89 closed 12/14/89 1:91-cv-01882-SS REES v. RUBLE, et al filed 07/30/91 closed 09/06/91 1:92-cv-00495-HHG REES v. LONG, et al filed 02/28/92 closed 03/ 17/92 1:92-cv-00619-TPJ REES, et al v. REYES, et al filed 03/10/92 closed 07/ 30/92 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Truthseeker Posted April 15, 2006 Report Share Posted April 15, 2006 Please show all of us that anyone of these lawsuits were improper. Your argument is weak. Let's talk about real facts like Sam Books selling out the GAY COMMUNITY for $10,000 from a GAY HATING retired congressman and many of his RELIGIOUS RIGHT FRIENDS. This above is public record. Attacks on Rees show no wring doing. For the record. Feel free to investigate these more. --------------- 1:90-cv-01360-SS REES v. DARO REALTY, INC. filed 06/11/90 closed 06/14/90 1:90-cv-02150-NHJ REES v. DARO REALTY, INC., et al filed 08/31/90 closed 01/24/91 1:91-cv-00334-NHJ REES v. DARO REALTY, INC., et al filed 02/14/91 closed 03/22/91 1:91-cv-01843-SS REES v. REYES filed 07/25/91 closed 08/06/91 1:91-cv-03287-HHG REES v. ARLINGTON CTY. JUVEN, et al filed 12/24/91 closed 03/04/92 1:94-cv-01364-RCL REES v. URBINA, et al filed 06/20/94 closed 07/27/94 1:96-cv-01238-GK PEARSON, et al v. KOLP, et al filed 06/04/96 closed 02/28/97 1:97-cv-02853-PLF REES v. KOLP filed 11/28/97 closed 01/30/98 1:88-cv-03515-RCL REES v. GRAHAM PHOTO SUPPLY filed 12/09/88 closed 02/28/89 1:89-cv-02095-GHR REES v. GRAY filed 07/26/89 closed 11/09/89 1:89-cv-02203-GHR REES v. CHON filed 08/03/89 closed 12/01/89 1:89-cv-03217-GHR REES v. FAMILY ACT. CENTER filed 11/30/89 closed 12/14/89 1:91-cv-01882-SS REES v. RUBLE, et al filed 07/30/91 closed 09/06/91 1:92-cv-00495-HHG REES v. LONG, et al filed 02/28/92 closed 03/ 17/92 1:92-cv-00619-TPJ REES, et al v. REYES, et al filed 03/10/92 closed 07/ 30/92 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
factchecker2 Posted April 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2006 Just pointing out who he really is. Let's see: Since we know that Rees lied about being part of a Department of Justice lawsuit and sting against Daro Reality, what else is lurking in that list of Rees' lawsuits? Jonathan Rees obviously prefers that his past remains hidden. But the public has a right to know about the real Jonathan Rees. And since Jonathan Rees won't even say where he went to school, its up to enterprising reporters, bloggers and just ordinary citizens to reveal the man behind the curtain. What else is Rees hiding from the voters? Please show all of us that anyone of these lawsuits were improper. Your argument is weak. Attacks on Rees show no wring doing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Truthseeker Posted April 15, 2006 Report Share Posted April 15, 2006 REES did not lie about his role in the case of USA v Daro and if you call Daro and ask them about Rees they will curse him out. Ask any employee of Daro and they will tell you Rees stung their bosses and if you call the US Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Div-Fair Housing section they will tell you that it was Rees that made that case for them. You need to stop all your lying SAM BROOKS as you are the liar. You lied about your work history. You lied about your educational history. You lied about caring about gay people but sold them out. Just pointing out who he really is. Let's see: Since we know that Rees lied about being part of a Department of Justice lawsuit and sting against Daro Reality, what else is lurking in that list of Rees' lawsuits? Jonathan Rees obviously prefers that his past remains hidden. But the public has a right to know about the real Jonathan Rees. And since Jonathan Rees won't even say where he went to school, its up to enterprising reporters, bloggers and just ordinary citizens to reveal the man behind the curtain. What else is Rees hiding from the voters? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfrankdc Posted April 15, 2006 Report Share Posted April 15, 2006 Rees, How many places to you post the "Rees & USA v Daro" information? Do you not understand that there is no such case? There is a Rees v Daro which is a Job Discrimination suit There is a US v Daro which is a Housing Discrimination suit. According to some nice sluething by someone at the City Paper blog, there is a website you made, where in your own words you claim to be a paralegal for the US v Daro case. No amount of backpeddling, etc. can dispute your lies. You lied about how many children you have (was it 0, 2, 3 or 3 and a foster child?) You lied about your marraiges (was it not married, twice married, once to Ms. Cisneros and once to Ms. Silverman, or OOOPs, there is a Blanca Reyes.) Indeed, according to the record, Ms. Reyes is the mother of your children, not Ms. Cisneros as you have claimed in posts here and at DCist. You lied about your employment history. You lied about your educational background. You have been banned from every internet forum that matters including this one several times (despite your registering again under yet ANOTHER alias. You have no more credibility. B. Frank REES did not lie about his role in the case of USA v Daro and if you call Daro and ask them about Rees they will curse him out. Ask any employee of Daro and they will tell you Rees stung their bosses and if you call the US Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Div-Fair Housing section they will tell you that it was Rees that made that case for them. You need to stop all your lying SAM BROOKS as you are the liar. You lied about your work history. You lied about your educational history. You lied about caring about gay people but sold them out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthseeker Posted April 15, 2006 Report Share Posted April 15, 2006 He's so ridiculous. I don't even bother anymore, except in extreme cases. It's like watching a train bent on derailing. It's chugging down the same old track, full OCD speed ahead, until suddenly, an actual idependantly-verifiable fact (disguised for the purposes of this tortured metaphor as a boulder) appears ahead of it. Instead of applying the brakes, said Crazy Conductor tries to tell all the passengers that there is no boulder. "Ask anyone! Everyone knows there's no boulder! It only looks like a boulder. I am the best conductor ever!" Only the conductor doesn't say it. Someone with his exact same voice gets on the PA system and says "I know the conductor! He's right about the boulder. Anyone who mentions the boulder is a liar and probably unemployed." In the story, the conductor is dangerous. And too blinded by his own egoism to see the harm he's doing, or why other people try to stop it. Rees, How many places to you post the "Rees & USA v Daro" information? Do you not understand that there is no such case? There is a Rees v Daro which is a Job Discrimination suit There is a US v Daro which is a Housing Discrimination suit. According to some nice sluething by someone at the City Paper blog, there is a website you made, where in your own words you claim to be a paralegal for the US v Daro case. No amount of backpeddling, etc. can dispute your lies. You lied about how many children you have (was it 0, 2, 3 or 3 and a foster child?) You lied about your marraiges (was it not married, twice married, once to Ms. Cisneros and once to Ms. Silverman, or OOOPs, there is a Blanca Reyes.) Indeed, according to the record, Ms. Reyes is the mother of your children, not Ms. Cisneros as you have claimed in posts here and at DCist. You lied about your employment history. You lied about your educational background. You have been banned from every internet forum that matters including this one several times (despite your registering again under yet ANOTHER alias. You have no more credibility. B. Frank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts